Clinical Evidence

Clinical Evidence for MyoPro: Outcomes, ADLs, and Quality of Life Impact

A growing body of clinical evidence suggests that, for appropriately selected users, the MyoPro® may support functional activity, activities of daily living, and upper-extremity function. Recent studies involving home use and individuals with stroke have reported improvements in task completion, performance of daily activities, and upper-limb outcome measures.

These findings suggest improvements across multiple validated outcome measures and support the use of the MyoPro® as a customized, home-based assistive orthosis in appropriately selected individuals.

Overview

What the evidence suggests

MyoPro® is an upper-limb orthosis designed to support performance of functional tasks with the affected limb. It is a compensatory device that uses the wearer’s own electromyography (EMG) signals to initiate powered movement. On the Myomo website, the device is indicated for adolescents ages 12 and older and adults with long-term muscle weakness, with candidacy determined through clinical evaluation and safe-use criteria.

Across the current evidence base, the most consistent findings center on three themes: improved functional task performance, improved performance of daily activities, and improvements in upper-extremity outcome measures among selected patients after stroke or other neurologic injury. The strongest evidence on Myomo’s research page currently includes peer-reviewed studies in chronic stroke, along with smaller studies and case series in traumatic brain injury and brachial plexus injury.

Outcomes

Functional outcomes and ADL impact

A 2023 home-use outcomes study published in Archives of Rehabilitation Research and Clinical Translation followed adults with chronic arm weakness after stroke over three months. Participants completed standardized daily tasks both with and without the MyoPro®. By three months, they were able to complete tasks more successfully, in less time, and with a higher probability of success when using the MyoPro® than without it. The authors concluded that participants were able to use their impaired arm more effectively during functional task performance in the home environment while using the device.

A 2024 retrospective study published in Prosthetics and Orthotics International evaluated home use of the MyoPro® in chronic stroke and reported improved Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scores, supporting potential benefits in perceived upper-limb disability and day-to-day arm use.

Earlier stroke studies have also reported improvements in measures of upper-extremity impairment. A 2020 randomized controlled trial published in the Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine studied myoelectric bracing in moderately impaired stroke survivors, while a 2017 study in Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation reported reduced upper-extremity impairment while participants wore the myoelectric elbow-wrist-hand orthosis.

Together, these studies suggest that the MyoPro® may support improvements in functional task performance, daily activity participation, and upper-extremity outcome measures when used in appropriately selected individuals.

Quality of life

Quality-of-life impact

For many patients, meaningful outcomes extend beyond assessment scores to participation in everyday activities. The available evidence suggests potential real-world functional benefits associated with MyoPro® use.

The 2023 home-use study specifically evaluated performance on simulated daily-living tasks and found that participants completed them more successfully and more efficiently while using the MyoPro®. Table 4 of the study highlights patient-reported examples of activities performed while using the device, including putting away socks, carrying dishes, folding towels, sweeping, making muffins, and stabilizing a bowl during food preparation.

These findings suggest that MyoPro® use may support participation in activities performed in the home environment. Participation in meaningful daily activities is often considered an important component of quality of life and patient-reported well-being.

The evidence base continues to evolve, and not every study directly evaluates quality of life as a primary endpoint. However, observed improvements in task success, time-to-completion, and upper-limb disability measures may represent clinically relevant changes that can be meaningful in everyday life for appropriately selected users.

Beyond stroke

Evidence beyond stroke

While stroke represents the most developed portion of the evidence base, Myomo’s research library also includes published work involving traumatic brain injury, brachial plexus injury, and spinal cord injury. These studies are generally smaller and should be interpreted accordingly, but they help illustrate how myoelectric orthotic support has been studied across different diagnoses.

For brachial plexus injury, Myomo’s evidence page cites both patient-perspective research and retrospective clinical work. Mayo Clinic publication records identify a 2021 Prosthetics and Orthotics International article examining patient perspectives and a 2021 Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics case series describing elbow flexion support in individuals with brachial plexus injury.

What to expect

What to expect

Patients and clinicians should approach MyoPro as part of a care pathway, not as a one-step solution. Myomo’s site presents the device as custom fabricated for each patient, with candidacy based on diagnosis, residual muscle signal, safety considerations, and functional goals. Myomo also provides clinician training resources, clinical resources, and an education pathway for Centers of Excellence and therapy training.

In practice, the journey usually includes:

  1. Screening and candidacy review
  2. Clinical evaluation and documentation
  3. Custom measurement and fitting
  4. Training and adjustment with a local OT/PT
  5. Home use with functional practice over time

The published home-use study followed users for three months and demonstrated improvements gradually over that period. The findings provide a reasonable evidence-based expectation that meaningful functional outcomes with the MyoPro are achieved through consistent use and practice rather than instantly on day one.

Who it helps

Who may find this page most helpful

This page offers a clear overview of the clinical evidence behind MyoPro for clinicians, patients, caregivers, and coverage reviewers. It is intended for readers who want to better understand published outcomes related to functional use, activities of daily living, and quality of life.

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

What kinds of outcomes have been studied with MyoPro?

Studies involving MyoPro® and related myoelectric upper-limb orthoses have evaluated outcomes including functional task performance, task completion time, upper-extremity impairment measures, and patient-reported disability measures such as the DASH questionnaire.

Does the evidence show MyoPro helps with activities of daily living?

In a recent home-use study, participants completed standardized daily tasks more successfully and in less time while using the MyoPro® compared with performance without the device.

Is there evidence supporting the use of the MyoPro with stroke survivors?

Yes. Myomo’s evidence library includes multiple stroke studies, including a 2024 retrospective study, a 2023 home-use outcomes study, a 2020 randomized controlled trial, and earlier clinical series.

Is there evidence supporting the use of the MyoPro with diagnoses other than stroke?

Yes, although the evidence base is more limited. Myomo’s evidence library includes smaller studies and case series involving traumatic brain injury, brachial plexus injury, and spinal cord injury.

How long does it take to see progress?

Published home-use studies have followed participants for up to three months and reported improvements in selected functional outcome measures over that period. Outcomes may vary based on individual patient characteristics, goals, training, and device use.

Who may not be a good candidate?

Examples of contraindications on Myomo’s clinician FAQ include insufficient EMG signal, severe shoulder subluxation, excessive pain during facilitated movement, recovery from acute injury, contractures that prevent functional movement, severe spasticity, cognitive or behavioral impairment, and other medical issues that would interfere with safe use.

Is the MyoPro custom fit?

Yes. Myomo states that each MyoPro is custom fabricated for the individual patient for comfort and performance.

Is training part of the process?

Yes. Myomo offers clinical resources, fitting materials, clinician education, and Center of Excellence training support, indicating that setup, adjustment, and user instruction are core parts of successful use.

References

Citations and Primary Studies

Primary studies featured on this page

  1. The Utilization Effects of Powered Wearable Orthotics in Improving Upper Extremity Function and ADL in Persons With SCI — Androwis, 2026 (10 people with SCI).
  2. Use of myoelectric orthosis after stroke or traumatic brain injury: a systematic review — Richards et al, 2025 (10 studies, 144 people with stroke and some TBI).
  3. Myoelectric Arm Orthosis in Motor Learning-Based Therapy for Chronic Deficits After Stroke and Traumatic Brain Injury — Pundik, 2022 (7 stroke and 6 TBI).
  4. Improved Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores after myoelectric arm orthosis use at home in chronic stroke: A retrospective study — Sarah R. Chang, Nicole Hofland, Zhengyi Chen, Harry Kovelman, George F. Wittenberg and Jonathan Naft.
  5. A 2025 systematic review found that patients using myoelectric orthoses like MyoPro were able to complete more activities and more parts of activities, supporting its role as a functional solution for upper-limb paralysis. (Richards et al, 2025).